Talk:Automaton Transfusion

Latest comment: 15 years ago by 76.24.231.227 in topic Notability

Notability edit

1) A cursory internet search only returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources

2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM

3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.

4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. It is a straight to DVD release, limiting its veiwing population, as well not producing a box office return of any note.

5) The film is not historically notable.

6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals.

7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.

10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.

I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Calm your tits, ya twat. --76.24.231.227 (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Running Time edit

The movie is only 72 minutes, not 80 minutes. People interested in the movie need to know the actual length of the movie.