Talk:Automated Targeting System

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

A quick review of the article shows that the authors, although undoubtedly acting in good faith, relied heavily on negative articles written on the subject. For example it leaves one with the impresson that ATS is focused on people and only people - in fact it is extensively used for cargo. There is more balanced material on the web and elsewhere. Wikipedia should include some of this material. 63.167.255.26 16:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The above IP address resolves to the Department of Homeland Security. Perhaps the poster is well placed to provide a primary source? topynate 03:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thats not the point, the point is that we must adhere to a netrual point of view and this article gravitates toward the negative with no discussion of the posotive. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have edited the article to put the rating factors before the opposition - it seems to me that how the system works is slightly more important then who doesn't like the system. PGWG (talk) 20:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Automated Targeting System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply