Talk:Austria–Greece relations

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Canadian-Greek relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 17:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: all pages moved per discussion. If there needs to be any further move for the South Korea and South Africa pages, that can be dealt with separately. I've fixed all the double-redicts (I think), but I haven't updated any templates or other links. - GTBacchus^(talk) 02:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

---

– 19:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

• Austria-Greece relations → Austria–Greece relations
• Armenian-Greek relations → Armenia–Greece relations
• Australian-Greek relations → Australia–Greece relations
• Belgium-Greece relations → Belgium–Greece relations
• Chile-Greece relations → Chile–Greece relations
• Estonia-Greece relations → Estonia–Greece relations
• Ethiopia-Greece relations → Ethiopia–Greece relations
• Finland-Greece relations → Finland–Greece relations
• Georgia-Greece relations → Georgia–Greece relations
• Germany-Greece relations → Germany–Greece relations
• Greek–Icelandic relations → Greece–Iceland relations
• Greece-Kazakhstan relations → Greece–Kazakhstan relations
• Greece-Kenya relations → Greece–Kenya relations
• Greek-South Korean relations → Greece – South Korea relations
• Greek-Latvian relations → Greece–Latvia relations
• Greek-Lebanese relations → Greece–Lebanon relations
• Greek-Lithuanian relations → Greece–Lithuania relations
• Greek-Moldovan relations → Greece–Moldova relations
• Dutch-Greek relations → Greece–Netherlands relations
• Greco-Romanian relations → Greece–Romania relations
• Greek-South African relations → Greece – South Africa relations
• Greek-Spanish relations → Greece–Spain relations
• Relations of Greece and Switzerland → Greece–Switzerland relations
• Greek-Tunisian relations → Greece–Tunisia relations
• Greek-Ukrainian relations → Greece–Ukraine relations
• Greek-Zimbabwean relations → Greece–Zimbabwe relations

The Greek bilateral relations atricles need changing to the same format as other bilateral relation articles i.e. Country–Country with an endash not hyphen, not "Country-Country", "Nationality-Nationality" or "Relations of Country and Country" (See Category:Bilateral_relations_of_Austria, Category:Bilateral_relations_of_Belgium and Category:Bilateral relations of Pakistan for examples of how Greece relations are different to others). Countries with a space in e.g. South Africa require spaces around the endash. See here for an example of a recent move to change Greek articles to common format. Delusion23 (talk) 09:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

• Support all per MOS:DASH and conformity with other bilateral relations articles. Jenks24 (talk) 21:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
• Support all per MOS:ENDASH #2. –CWenger (^ • @) 21:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
• Support all per nom Constantine ✍ 22:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
• Support all per nom Tony (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
• Comment – Please review MOS:ENDASH re "Countries with a space in e.g. South Africa require spaces around the endash." That kind of spacing went out the window with the latest consensus, no? "The en dash in all of the compounds above is unspaced." I recommend that the requester amend the request to not space the en dashes with South Korea and South Africa, and then I will support all; would anyone object? Dicklyon (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment – well you've definately got your work cut out for you if that's the new rule. Check out this [1] and this [2]. All of them need changing and that's just the beginning. Delusion23 (talk) 12:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
    • Indeed, it's a bigger change than people realized, I think, which is why I started a question about it at WT:MOS#Spaces in "XXX – United States relations". You can comment there. Dicklyon (talk) 15:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
• Support. Attempts to move these Greek ones without a discussion were always resisted by exactly one editor, who claimed there was no consensus for this format, even though almost all other bilateral relations articles consistently use the form without major objections. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 04:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
• Support all except the South Africa and South Korea ones, for which I believe the new consensus (though I haven't looked at the discussion since I got back from hols) is that there should be no spaces round the dash.--Kotniski (talk) 08:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

  Comment: on closing this, those two can go either way. A simple move will adjust spacing later if needed. Dicklyon (talk) 16:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Austria–Greece relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090508173249/http://www.griechische-botschaft.at/main.php?lg=lo to http://www.griechische-botschaft.at/main.php?lg=lo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)