Talk:Aulacodes pulchralis

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aulacodes pulchralis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006084857/http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx to http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Aulacodes pulchralis or Eoophyla pulchralis

@Ruigeroeland: This article has Aulacodes pulchralis as the title but Eoophyla pulchralis in the text and taxobox. There is an article for Eoophyla pulchralis. At GlobIZ both are listed and I can't tell what should be done. Same issue at Talk:Aulacodes cervinalis. Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  04:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)