Talk:August 1992 Şırnak Clashes

Battle ?

As long as I know, this was not a battle. For example, "Destruction of (the town of) Şırnak" (Amnesty), "Raid on (the town of) Şırnak" are more realistic.

Takabeg (talk) 06:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

I found the term "Battle of Sirnak" in google books (only one result). But even this auther wrote, "The Battle of Sirnak had not been a battle but a drawn-out punitive spasm...".

Takabeg (talk) 07:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Tak Flag.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Tak Flag.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Tak Flag.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

"Battle" of Şırnak?

Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karak1lc1k (talk • contribs) 19:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Şırnak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121008070426/http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/EUR44/096/1992/es/40917938-ed8d-11dd-95f6-0b268ecef84f/eur440961992en.html to http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/EUR44/096/1992/es/40917938-ed8d-11dd-95f6-0b268ecef84f/eur440961992en.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121008070426/http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/EUR44/096/1992/es/40917938-ed8d-11dd-95f6-0b268ecef84f/eur440961992en.html to http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/EUR44/096/1992/es/40917938-ed8d-11dd-95f6-0b268ecef84f/eur440961992en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Changes

Someone is editing articles related to PKK and changing them as attacks were not directly related to them. Like in this article, they've added the attackers as YDG-H, for an attack done in 1992. YDG-H was founded in 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.201.37.52 (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Şırnak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716081035/http://www.asylumlaw.org/docs/turkey/mar99_turkey_kurds.pdf to http://www.asylumlaw.org/docs/turkey/mar99_turkey_kurds.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Issues with this article

• The article is pretty much written from the Turkish military point of view. Views by Amnesty International which speaks about the heavy handed approach of the Turkish side, suppression of civilians and journalists for example, has been put under sectioned "controversy", but really isn't fitting. A single source calling it a battle seems to be just repeating turkish militaries original statements.
• Civilians who were able to be interviewed state that the destruction/damage of buildings while they were inside was due to the bombardment by tanks and cannons, something the PKK does not have.
• The cause of 20,000 of Şırnak's 25,000 civilians fleeing the town is more likely due to the excessive and disproportionate acts by the turkish side.
• One source that uses "battle of sirnak" actually argues it was not really a battle, yet the title seems to be using it and referencing to it. I've already reverted what looks like vandalism. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_%C5%9E%C4%B1rnak&diff=next&oldid=870032044