Talk:Auditory learning

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 192.171.164.107 in topic Monsters and magical sticks

Monsters and magical sticks edit

This reference does not qualify as a rigorous scientific publication. It is a book about hypnosis from 1987, published by a company that seems to focus on pseudoscience (astrology, magic, karma and similar). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.164.107 (talk) 15:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

Is there any citation for this? A lot of the information seems suspect. Ilikerps

Auditory learning is a valid concept, but this particular article seems to be describing something else. Since there are articles for visual learning and kinesthetic learning, I think it would be worthwhile to revise this article. Hanacy 01:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I wonder if some of the citations for the use of auditory-themed language tropes ("Sounds good to me!") aren't specious. I would think the audio-focused might use more language cliches in the first place, because that's when whole phrases themselves start to have meaning outside of their constituent parts. But the idea that people automatically theme their phrases to how they supposedly learn sounds silly. 69.94.192.147 (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delete article? edit

This seems to be a rubbish article. If there's no way to improve it, maybe it should be deleted. There's already information on VAK in Learning style and VAK. Piechjo (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Piechjo

the article does need tidying up and more input, but currently there are not many who are willing to do the neccessary research. This is a very important issue, especaily with regard to how some need to cope with dyaleixa and other learing disabilities.

dolfrog (talk) 12:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auditory learning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply