Talk:Attribution bias/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by TheSpecialUser in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 14:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Quick fail. I'll finish by tonight. TheSpecialUser TSU 14:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- The main reason for the failure is lack of sources and verification issue. The article has 13 sources from which the content cannot be verified much. One should provide links to either ISBN or any site link where the link is present. The article has many facts unsourced so it qualifies for a quick fail. Other issues include, MoS corrections, c/e, and the topic is presented in a bit confusing manner if seen from readers point of view who knows nothing about the topic. The prose is a bit confusing so requires attention from an editor who is knowledgeable in the topic as well as needs few MoS fixes as well as large number of sources. These are tough to fix in a month or some so I'm sorry to say but it is a quick fail.