Talk:Athletic Grounds (Armagh)

May have to move this eventually

Interesting that there's no other facility listed on wikipedia called "Athletic Grounds". Nonetheless, I suspect that we're going to have to move this page eventually, maybe to something like Armagh Athletic Grounds. --Eamonnca1 (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Terrace / seating

There's a source saying that the plan was to add terracing all the way round, but from the photos I've seen it looks like that new stand is an all-seater. Can anyone confirm? Also, it'd be good if we could get a photo of the new stand. --Eamonnca1 (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Athletic Grounds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106030150/http://www.armagh-gaa.com:80/My-Armagh/Athletic-Grounds.aspx to http://www.armagh-gaa.com/My-Armagh/Athletic-Grounds.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605042703/http://www.4ni.co.uk/northern_ireland_news.asp?id=10792 to http://www.4ni.co.uk/northern_ireland_news.asp?id=10792

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 31 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved, to Athletic Grounds (Armagh) – consensus to move away from Athletic Grounds, but no consensus on the new title. The discussion has died down after being open for a month and relisted three times. Editors did not reach consensus on whether it's preferable to use a comma or parentheses. One argument is that it would be consistent with British (or Commonwealth) buildings and sites to use a comma. Another argument is that it would be consistent with stadia to use parentheses. A third is that it would be consistent with British stadium articles to use parentheses. Following what WP:RMCI calls WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE, I am moving to one of the options, and I take the third argument to be the tiebreaker between the first two, without endorsing any particular view about the most relevant comparator set of articles for purposes of consistency or whether the status quo within any of these sets is good or bad. A new move request, or other form of discussion, is permitted at any time. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

---

Athletic Grounds → Athletic Grounds, Armagh – also normally with "The", same as Talk:The Athletic Grounds. See current RM there also. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 17:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 04:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Corrected RM to comma, sorry about that. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

• Support the current title should point to Athletic Ground (disambiguation) -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
• Support and maybe change Athletic Ground, Richmond to Athletic Ground (Richmond) for consistency. TheLostBoy (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

  No, it's the other way around. Comma disambiguation is used for Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 162 etc. (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

• Support Athletic Grounds, Armagh. Comma disambiguation is standard for Commonwealth articles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, >>> Extorc.talk 17:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Unclear what is the apt title.

Relisting comment: Fix improper relist. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 17:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

• Support move to Athletic Grounds, Armagh, and support retargeting the current title to Athletic Ground (disambiguation). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Actually... a look at Category:Football venues in England shows parenthetical disambiguation for sports venues in other areas of the UK. I've struck the support of the comma-based disambiguation for now as such. However, I'm not familiar with this area – 162 etc. or Necrothesp, can you chip in since you're supporting comma-based disambiguation? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Then they're wrong and should be moved. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
      • Done. The problem is that some football fans on here seem to have got it into their heads that consistency among football stadium articles is more important than the long-established convention that Commonwealth articles use comma rather than parenthetical disambiguation. In other words, a few opinions in a subject-specific project (and there's no consensus even there as far as I can tell, only the opinions of a couple of editors) are more important than long-established consensus about many thousands of articles pertaining to entire countries. This, of course, cannot be acceptable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Support Athletic Grounds (Armagh) for now per Category:Football venues in England and Amakuru. If we want further discussion on which disambiguator should be used, this is not the place – the discussion would affect many more articles, and a multi-move RM or a project page discussion should be opened instead. Right now, the WP:CONSISTENT form is the parenthetical disambiguator. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
• Move to Athletic Grounds (Armagh). Strong oppose move to the comma version, we established at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_77#Inconsistency_in_stadium_article_titles that stadia use parentheses, which is also correct per WP:NATURALDIS, which says to use comma-separated disambiguation for place names, but not particularly for other entities. There's something of a convention that certain Commonwealth entities (but not US ones) use commas, but that certainly isn't set in stone and goes somewhat against other conventions. Certainly there's no need to introduce it afresh here.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Established?! Where was it established? Four opinions expressed on a local project years ago, before it was very clearly established by consensus that Commonwealth (other than Canada) places, sites and buildings are disambiguated by commas rather than parentheses. You're not seriously suggesting a local project opinion, not even any sort of consensus, should overrule a consensus of consistency among British articles, are you? All you need to do is look at any category relating to British sites to show what the consensus is here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

    We have a consistent approach for stadia, which has stood the test of time, there is absolutely no reason to deviate from that now.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

    We have a consistent approach for British articles, which has stood the test of time, there is absolutely no reason to deviate from that now. I find it ridiculous that a few editors expressing an opinion on a project a decade ago should be allowed to overrule the overwhelmingly consistent naming of thousands of sites in a country (and other countries). -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

    How are they overruling them? And what is the rationale for this supposed convention anyway? Why should British entities be titled in a way that's different from how they're titled in the US and elsewhere? There's no WP:ENGVAR basis for this, it's not an actual real-world distinction that we're honouring. If anything, in the real world it's Americans who put more commas than we do, since they like to append a statename on to everything even where it's not necessary. In any case, the whole thing is a ridiculous anachronism and as was clear from the consensus in the conversation I linked above, it goes against the article title guideline's instructions to use commas for places and parentheses for other things. Moving buildings and monuments other things over to consistent parenthetical disambiguation is a goal for another day, but for the time being we at the very least don't need to make the problem worse by adding stadia to the list of things using comma disambiguation, given that they're already consistently titled with parentheses and agreed as such in the discussion.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

    It's not just British entities. Comma disambiguation is used for every Commonwealth country except Canada. Usage for other countries, except the USA and Canada, is mixed. The idea that Britain is an outlier is entirely false. In what possible way is it an anachronism? In the real world, we would generally use commas rather than parentheses (how do we write an address, for instance?). It is Wikipedia that uses odd phrasing (for North America, and, at your insistence, for stadia). -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Neds better consensus between Athletic Grounds, Armagh and Athletic Grounds (Armagh), and the primary deciding policy (the one governing names in commonwealth coutries or the one regarding football grounds) Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

@CapnJackSp: what are you referring to? There is no "deciding policy" regarding commonwealth countries. We have a consistent approach to stadia, which was agreed by consensus in a discussion I linked above, and is applied to all others on the same category. There can be no conceivable case for making this a single outlier to all those others, and I suggest the move go ahead straight away. Change to the wider approach to this would be the subject of a much larger RM. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 10:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

It is entirely laughable that you claim consensus based on the opinions of four editors in a brief discussion on a project talkpage a decade ago, going against consensus established for Commonwealth buildings and sites at RM many times. As to this article being an outlier, I moved all the British stadia to the comma form per longstanding consensus for British buildings and you moved them all back again per this limited project-specific discussion years ago and your own views. Consensus on the wider category of British buildings and sites very clearly favours comma disambiguation. There is no reason why this should be considered to be overruled by a project-specific "consensus" which actually isn't a consensus anyway. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

• Support per nom, primary topic is the dab—blindlynx 17:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.