This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
The image is appropriately tagged; sources are reliable.
"he wrote various didactics": does the source use "didactic" as a noun? Does this refer to a poetic form?
Ops, the source says "didactic" as well, fixed it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
How can it be simultaneously true that his work is "highly esteemed in scholarship" but "overlooked by scholars"? And that he has "only received little attention in scholarship"? Seems like perhaps a conflict between the western and Persian sources?
Ops, seems like I misread the source. He was highly esteemed amongst figures around his own time period, not present-day. Slightly changed it [1], will change it more in a bit. EDIT: Did a bit more adjusting, thoughts? --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Athir al-Din is well-known for his rhetoric skills, especially when it was a figure of speech": what does this mean? "Figure of speech" is a pretty general term.
Unfortunately the source simply says "figure of speech" ("Athīr al-Dīn stands out for his rhetorical ability, particularly in the construction of figures of speech."). I've altered it a bit to match the source more, thoughts? [2] --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's a bit vague. I think I would just cut it. If you'd rather keep it, perhaps make it a direct quote? And given that we've said he's neglected by modern scholars, I think we need to say in what sense he is "well-known for his rhetorical skills" -- "scholars who have studied his work praise his rhetorical skills", perhaps? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
There were a few infelicities in the prose but it was easier to fix them myself. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
