Talk:Atari Word Processor
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Atari Word Processor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that one reviewer called deleting a block of text in Atari Word Processor "as easy as a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l"? Source: https://archive.org/details/creativecomputing-1982-06/page/n71/
- ALT1: ... that running Atari's Word Processor on their 400 home computer with a memory expansion voided the software's warranty? Source: https://books.google.ca/books?id=bDAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA31
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rhino Rumble
Created by 108.168.93.43 (talk). Nominated by DigitalIceAge (talk) at 07:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC).
- Review:
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
@DigitalIceAge: The article was properly created and possesses enough weight. Still, the hook might come across as hard to understand for the general reader while there are some few red links that might need to be removed.Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Just a note that per Wikipedia:Red link, red links to plausible new articles should not be removed - Dumelow (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
@DigitalIceAge: That's better. Passing the review,Tintor2 (talk) 21:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Tintor2: thanks for the review! Just pinging to let you know my QPQ requirement has been fulfilled. DigitalIceAge (talk) 00:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
