Talk:Aspergirls

Visibility

To get addtional visiblity, if there are any additional books added for Rudy Simone, you may want to add:

• [[Category:Books about autism]] to the bottom of the article
• The articles to Template:Autism resources in the books section

I've taken care of both of those for this book.--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Balanced viewpoint

Are there any sources which don't include positive reviews of this book? Or criticism of assumptions that girls with Aspergers are different from boys with Aspergers? This article seems a little unbalanced and reads like an advertisement for the book and its author in its current state. Totorotroll (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

@Totorotroll: Regarding the tone of the article, I think the body of the article is fine, I am assuming that you're referring to the "Reception" section, which should absolutely present a balanced response. It could be updated with alternative opinions and perhaps some of the language toned down.

I'm not sure what you mean by: "Or criticism of assumptions that girls with Aspergers are different from boys with Aspergers?"--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

I made some minor tweaks to "Reception", and looked around for bad reviews, but the book is very well-received. Even looking on Amazon, etc. site - just to get a feel for things - it's well received by readers, too. Do you know of some reviews that would help give a more balanced viewpoint? Do you have specific suggestions for this article?--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I haven't read the book, all I have to go by is the references on this page. When I write "criticism of assumptions that girls with Aspergers are different from boys with Aspergers?" I'm referring to the Telegraph article, which describes that girls with Aspergers behave differently from boys with Aspergers. I'm guessing that this is also discussed in the book? If so, again, I would just think that a balanced viewpoint would be welcome, with views from people who support the idea and views from people who are against the idea. Also, I don't necessarily mean bad reviews, just a range of viewpoints, that's all. I'll look myself and see if I can find anything. Totorotroll (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

In the article, I'm referring to the sentence: "Simone said that even though boys and girls have the symptoms, it is expressed differently between the two genders." - I think that this is a point which would be worth evaluating. Totorotroll (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Sounds like great additions! Let me know if you need any help making them.--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Reading this book I was amazed to find that the author is a firm believer of ESP (see page 40, under heading "Psychic Sensitivity"). I think this should be mentioned in the article here (since it might be relevant to someone who'd be interested in reading the book) but I don't know how to add without sounding bitter and un-wikipedia-like. I've written a (quite negative) review the book here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5805828789 zrajm (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspergirls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812000504/http://www.autismohio.org/index.php/information-mainmenu-118/new-autism-materials/1466-book-aspergirls-empowering-females-with-asperger-syndrome-by-rudy-simone to http://www.autismohio.org/index.php/information-mainmenu-118/new-autism-materials/1466-book-aspergirls-empowering-females-with-asperger-syndrome-by-rudy-simone

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)