This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This page has been listed for deletion under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7. Criteria A7 says [this] criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. This article states very clearly in the second paragraph of the History section why the site is significant - I believe the speedy deletion should not take place. -- FlutefluteTalkContributions 08:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
As is stands this article relies almost entirely on references from websites associated with the subject of the article. As such I have tagged it for one source and also notability. The article is also pretty spammy and promotional. Unless someone can find some independent third party refs that establish notability then I think it should go to WP:AFD so the greater community can have a say on it. - Ahunt (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay I have addressed all of the issues I brought up above, added two independent refs, removed the tags and added the logo and screenshot (after some confusion there). I also edited the text to make it less spammy, so I don't see a pressing need to take this to AfD at this point. - Ahunt (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
