Talk:Asiavorator

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 04:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the fossils of the prehistoric mammal Asiavorator have been assigned to four different genera since they were first discovered in 1924? Source: Egi, Naoko; Tsubamoto, Takehisa; Saneyoshi, Mototaka; Tsogtbaatar, Khishigjav; Watabe, Mahito; Mainbayar, Buuvei; Chinzorig, Tsogtbaatar; Khatanbaatar, Purevdorg (2016-02-17). "Taxonomic revisions on nimravids and small feliforms (Mammalia, Carnivora) from the Upper Eocene of Mongolia". Historical Biology. 28 (1–2): 105–119. doi:10.1080/08912963.2015.1012508. ISSN 0891-2963.

5x expanded by Olmagon (talk). Self-nominated at 20:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Asiavorator; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   Article was significantly expanded within the allotted time. Hook is well sourced, as is the rest of the article. I think ALT1 is the better of the two hooks. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply