Talk:Asadullah Jan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

move edit

What is the source for the name that is used now? After carefully evaluating the sources in the article and multiple secondary sources from search results. I plan to move the article to Asad Ullah. Any objection? IQinn (talk) 11:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

In this suggested rename you have asserted that you have "carefully evaluated" multiple secondary sources from search results. Please start "showing your work". Please stop claiming you have reviewed multiple secondary sources without stating what those sources area -- and linking to them. There is an overhead for renaming articles, and it should only be done for good reasons. Geo Swan (talk) 13:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes i carefully checked and evaluated sources and put time into that. Have you checked the new name suggestion in the search engines and additional sources? Could you please answer my question and explain and give the source for the name that is use now? IQinn (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The article clearly states: "Joint Task Force Guantanamo analysts assert his name was 'Assad Ullah'. But in interviews with reporters with the McClatchy News Service in 2008 he said his name was 'Asadullah Jan'." You assert: "Yes i carefully checked and evaluated sources and put time into that." Well, you seem to have skipped checking the article and its own references.
In your careful check and evaluation you also seem to have overlooked that the Guantanamo analysts assigned the name Asad Ullah to two Guantanamo captives. Geo Swan (talk) 16:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
For the first part: Your guess is wrong. Of course i saw that and have checked the sources in the article as i said.
For the second part: Your guess is also wrong. I know that as well. ISN 912 is the other individual with the same name that spent time in Guantanamo.
The articles of the individuals with the Guantanamo ISN 47 and ISN 912 are both named incorrectly at the moment. IQinn (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Asadullah Jan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Asadullah Jan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply