Talk:Arturo Carsetti
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Alexmar983 in topic Maintenance templates 13-FEB-2020
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance templates 13-FEB-2020
editI have placed the following templates for the following reasons:
- COI - the subject of the article has asked another editor to insert text from them into the article. The nature of this relationship is unknown, but apparently the inserting editor has placed information from the subject without checking its veracity (or its copyright status). This suggests the adding of information without a critical eye to its appropriateness.
- Refimprove - there are several sections of text which are unreferenced.
- Inappropriate person - the article uses "we" in several instances.
- Unbalanced - the article drifts off topic to state many of the subject's views in a large portion of the article.
Regards, Spintendo 17:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- This sounds a little bit exaggerated. We need people to revise and improve articles, not put too much templates IMHO. I personally don't think the article so critical. I suggest to move template for lack of sources to specific sections.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- As I told, I removed refimprove. It should be pinpointed maybe in the text where sources are needed. This is not an overall poorly sourced article, the only way to improve the aspect if needed is IMHO to be more accurate.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)