This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
...Bill Maher saying that the sequel was as good as or better than the original, but that alcoholism had ceased to be a joke by the time of its release. Ifnkovhg (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Was it the writing, the story, or what? I'm watching Arthur again - after having stopped watching Arthur 2 halfway through. Why was it such a failure? --Uncle Ed (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
