Talk:Arrest of Randal Worcester

Latest comment: 1 year ago by CSJJ104 in topic Did you know nomination

Why was Worcester arrested in the first place? edit

This article seems to justify its claim to fame because there is a video of Worcester being violently assaulted while he was being arrested. The article also needs to explain what Worcester did in the first place to attract Police attention seriously enough for Police to decide to arrest him in such a violent way. Like, was he trying to kill people or blow up the town? Police do not usually arrest somebody in this way for no reason at all; they usually need to have a reasonable cause. Also, what, offences, was he subsequently charged with, if any? Was he injured by the assault? Did he need medical attention? Has he been released? Will he appear in court? - Cameron Dewe (talk) 09:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • @Cameron Dewe: - the article is a work in progress. I have begun to answer some of your questions (what, offences, was he subsequently charged with, if any ... Did he need medical attention? Has he been released? , with the answers being edited into the article, but I require some time before I return to answer more. starship.paint (exalt) 15:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • what Worcester did in the first place to attract Police attention - now answered. When I eventually have time, I will add more. starship.paint (exalt) 06:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • @Cameron Dewe: - more added - for your information. starship.paint (exalt) 13:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Starship.paint (talk). Self-nominated at 13:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   QPQ has been supplied. The article is new enough and long enough. Sources look solid; no quality issues there. Hook fact checks out and is neutral—the article is also neutral. No textual issues. Earwig mostly flags quotes, which are from narratives and included to provide neutrality by not paraphrasing. Good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 09:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Sammi Brie and Starship.paint: Oh my, I have no idea what I was looking at. I must need new glasses or more caffeine or something. My apologies. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply