Talk:Arora (web browser)

Untitled

Arora satisfies notability. It has been mentioned and discussed all over the Internet; highlights include a brief article on Lifehacker and a stint in the Kubuntu 9.10 Alpha 3 as the default browser. Additionally, regardless of external coverage, users will come to Wikipedia expecting encyclopedic coverage of this neat new browser they just downloaded and started fiddling with; I know I did, and was very disappointed that it had been deleted. I'm willing to start integrating references, but somebody with a bit more experience with Wikipedia than me would probably be preferable. --Nonsensicality (talk) 16:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks for recreating the article. I've been thinking of doing this myself, mostly using the Kubuntu adoption as an argument for notability. - Sikon (talk) 04:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
• Concur as to notability. With netbooks and cloud computing on the rise, alternate low-resource browsers are increasingly relevant. Peter (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Suggest for "Endorphin Browser" to mention the rendering-engine changed

Like I commented within the talk pages for Dooble: " Qt Software included a WebKit port in the Qt 4.4 release as a module called QtWebKit[72] (since superseded by Qt WebEngine, which uses Blink instead). " Therefore can we please if we mention forks at all also note that Aaron Dewes variant used QTWebEngine like mentioned in the github source of his first commit, that they swapped from the Webkit-engine to the more modern Qt WebEngine 5 (https://github.com/EndorphinBrowser/browser/commit/d277b7459cb038f1d16783ebbc963603aa39fcef). --2A02:8388:4501:1F00:2557:90B:C06C:C458 (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)