This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't think I've ever seen an article so obviously written by its subject or someone close to him. The article needs heavy editing to be considered encyclopedic. Scrawlspacer (talk) 12:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
On 13 December 2010 I wrote a message to Scrawlspacer on his/her talk page: "Arnold Resnicoff". I thought to ask Scrawlspacer to tell me which parts are NOT "neutral", but I noticed that he/she wrote that the article "needs heavy editing to be considered encyclopedic". So, I decided to contact Scrawlspacer on his/her talk page to know, more precisely, what are his thoughts about that. Since I have not yet received a reply, I removed (today, 22 December 2010) the {{POV}} from the article as per point 2: "Discussions about neutrality issues have stopped (for more than a few days)" (it never started) ... and point 3: "The problems in the article have been resolved" (I think — and I really hope — I have resolved all the problems in the article) of the When to remove section in the template documentation. Happy editing! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
