Talk:Armed Forces of Armenia/Archive 1

Archive 1

Before editing

Before any user makes a major edit to this article, you must first post your reason. As we have had POV pushers adding info that fits their view and taking out other info that they call "POV", I am forced to ask all users to follow this. If the problem continues, this article will be blocked from being edited.--Moosh88 08:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

POV

"Armenia is prepared to mobilize every able-bodied man between the ages of 15 and 59, if Turkey or Azerbaijan should threaten it."

This is a speculation and definitely Armenian POV. Armenia is occupying Azeri territory, this is a fact declared by the UN, don't try to show Azeri demand for their lands as agression.

"...thus the armed forces of Armenia are the most powerful of the three Caucasian countries (the other two being Georgia and Azerbaijan)[citation needed]."

Once again Armenian POV. There are many aspects of deciding an army's strength and some of them are incalculable such as combat capabilities of officers and generals.

Also this:

"...several batteries of S-300 anti-aircraft missiles, which are capable of reaching Ankara and Baku."

This article looks like it was taken from a national security text prepared by Armenian Army. National security departments print texts such as these to ensure the citizens that they are safe. But this is Wikipedia, write necessary information, not propaganda. Give the range of missiles, not targets, what an ...

I am not making any changes, just putting a POV tag until these issues are addressed.--Kagan the Barbarian 08:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

---

Yes this is exacly what I mean and was trying to say Kagan, but they accuse me of being anti-armenian. The fact is Karabakh isnt regonized anywere in the world, not even by Armenia thus it makes their military an illigal military, this should be edited. They say my sources are not credible, since when are the CIA and UN not credicle sources? But instead armenian site such as are credible? This article contains a lot of POV:

armeniannow.com

Also I am reuquesting somebody to edit the saying:

"...several batteries of S-300 anti-aircraft missiles, which are capable of reaching Ankara and Baku."

This looks a lot like a threat, instead targets it would have distance those missiles can travel, not targets. This would be more informational.

S-300 can’t reach anything, they are antimissile rockets, i.e. they are intended to hit missiles, not ground targets. Grandmaster 18:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok I think we have enough evidence that this POV article, I dont want to edit cuz then this guy will come crying to me again. Also how can the Karabakh military be added to the Armenian military page? Karabakh isnt part of Armenia, its occupied by Armenia. By this the article almost supports to annex Karabakh to Armenia. I think the military of unregonized NKR should have its own page under unregonized militaries.

It look as if we got the entire pro azeri lobby attacking this page. Are you looking for me to go get the pro Armenian members here and have another useless wiki war because of a few lines that you claim are POV, yet the info you have on the military of azerbaijan page is POV as well, i.e. stateing that the azeri government is challenging the Armenian government by raising their military budget to $1 billion. I'm not crying foul on that, even though I could if I want, because it seems like an agressive statement, but I decided to be logical and thus not say anything; it's a fact of life for the citizens of Armenia and azerbaijan as well as Karabagh, war can start again. Don't sit there in front of you PC screens and tell me that it is POV for Armenians to think the azeri's and turks are their enemies, the opposite is true and was proven earlier this year when an innocent Armenian soldier was murdered in cold blood by an azeri soldier, while they were serving with a NATO program.

And if the UN is to be the ulitmate arbitar, well then quit debating the Armenian Genocide, cause they UN said that happened. The info baku87 used from the UN site is atleast 2-3 years old, it's not current. The info I used was from Armenian, Russian, American and European sources, which are more current than the UN site baku87 used.--Moosh88 19:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Moosh88, this article says "Bring it on, homey", "We can bitchslap youse guys capitals, how do you like that huh?", "We are the best in the Caucasus, baby, dig that?" etc, childish non-sense like that. But Military of Azerbaijan article needs editing as well. If both parties accept this then we can start making some progress for NPoV.--Kagan the Barbarian 22:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

S-300 can’t reach anything, they are antimissile rockets, i.e. they are intended to hit missiles, not ground targets. Grandmaster 18:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Grandmaster the S300 "Grumble" is a long range surface-to-air anti-aircraft battery platform. One version of the S300 is the PMU model which is designed for anti-missile defense.

From FAS:

The S-300PMU [SA-10 land-based, SA-N-6 naval version] surface-to-air missile system is able to engage a number of targets simultaneously, countering intensive aircraft raids at low-to-high altitude. The SA-10 offers significant advantages over older strategic surface-to-air missile systems, including multitarget handling and engagement characteristics, a capability against low altitude targets with small radar cross-sections such as cruise missiles, a capability against tactical ballistic missiles, and possibly a potential to intercept some types of strategic ballistic missiles. [1]

So it plays a dual role, both countering strategic missile launches and aircraft. There's nothing POV or not factual in it. Azerbaijan has vowed to take by territory and Turkey has more subtly agreed to help them via logistics, specialists, ect. There has been speculation Turkey might even invade Turkey by some sources but there is nothing wrong with including the hostile countries surrounding Armenia.--MarshallBagramyan 20:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I suppose you haven't read the article Bagramyan. It suggests ground targets (Ankara, Baku) for S-300. Anyway, from what I see in both Armed Forces of Armenia and Military of Azerbaijan articles, both parties are trying to intimidate each other on paper with their military power. I think we need users with good faith to edit the both articles to NPoV.

As for this:

"Azerbaijan has vowed to take by territory and Turkey has more subtly agreed to help them via logistics, specialists, ect. There has been speculation Turkey might even invade Turkey by some sources but there is nothing wrong with including the hostile countries surrounding Armenia."

You are trying to divert the subject with speculations, from the truth that is Armenia is occupying Azeri territory and this article is Armenian POV.--Kagan the Barbarian 22:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The real truth is that you (kagan) are trying to push your turkish POV on wikipedia, by reading your user page and talk page, one can see what your motivations really are. And if Armenia is occupying azeri territory, then turkey is occypying Armenian territory.

You and people like you will not intimidate us from posting the truth.--Moosh88 00:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Show me one article where I pushed Turkish POV and I'll edit it. What I am saying in my user page is there are Armenians, Greeks such as you who push their POV on articles, including Turks related topics, and I am going to counter them whever I see them for the sake of NPoV.

Once again you are diverting the subject. Turkey's borders are internationally recognized, Karabagh is not.

You can spot the PPoVs in the Military of Azerbaijan article but not in this one? Let me edit both articles and if you think it is not NPoV then we discuss until we reach common ground.--Kagan the Barbarian 08:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I added the POV tag on the Military of Azerbaijan page as well to show my honest intention. I don't have the time right now to determine the sentences that lack NPoV in the article. You tell me what you find Azeri POV in the article and we discuss it later. Laters--Kagan the Barbarian 08:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

For example in the Armenian Legion article you wanted to put a POV tag, on your talk page you told another user to watch who he/she works with. It seems as if you think this is some battle ground and that the enemies of turkey are out to get you and yours.

You know what else is internationaly recognized... the Armenian Genocide, so why do we still have some people that want to debate whether it happened or not?

I will edit this article, you can work on the military of azerbaijan article.--Moosh88 17:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

What are you trying to say Moosh88 that Karabakh is part of Armenia? Karabakh is occupied by Armenia and not regonized by any country in the world and that includes Armenia. But Turkey its borders are regonized by all countries including Armenia.

First off, Karabagh is not occupied by anyone, it belongs to the Armenians of Karabagh, second, Armenia recognizes the borders set up by the Treaty of Sevres, which is not the border that is currently in place.--Moosh88 19:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Moosh88 please stop talking nonesense be realistic when we are debating. Karabakh is internationally regonized lands of Azerbaijan Republic ands its occupied by Armenia. You cannot possibly start to deny this, its nonesense. This all just your opinion, but we are debating in general nodboy is really interessed in opinions. Baku87 13:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

For the last time, Armenia is not occupying Karabagh, the war was fought between Karabagh and Azerbaijan, then Armenia joined. The forces guarding Karabagh are Armenians that live there, not Armenians from Armenia, although the two militaries are deeply integrated.

If you don't have anything related to the article then quit posting here.--Moosh88 20:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

What you are saying doesnt make any sense. You are denying the 20% occupation of Azeri lands by Armenia. According to the CIA:

http://cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/am.html#Issues

Armenia supports ethnic Armenian secessionists in Nagorno-Karabakh and since the early 1990s, has militarily occupied 16% of Azerbaijan

This says more then enough about the occupation of Azeri lands by Armenia. Baku87 00:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

You keep rehashing this over and over again. We don't agree with one another and that is that, what is the point of keeping this discussion going? It has nothing to do with this article, so I'm going to drop it and I suggest you do too.--Moosh88 05:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Your are right about the fact that this discussion has little to do with the article, but Im just discussing it, nothing special. Its not about your opinion or mine opinion, whether you like it or not 20% of Azerbaijan is occupied by Armenia, you dont have to agree but get the facts straight. Baku87 15:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

If you really take in the calculations, the number is more close to 13-14%, even De Waal coorects this. The CIA is just quoting the oft-repeated number by the Azerbaijani government. The Karabakh committee voted to secede from Azerbaijan in 1988 in accordance to the Soviet constitution. Armenians were the dominant majority in the 1920s when the Kavburo under the watchful of Stalin sliced up the Caucasus and handed over parts of Armenia to Azerbaijani ownership. The land never truly belonged to Azerbaijan but was given in order to galvanize ethnic strife between the two and have Russia play the mediator and manipulate the two. After 70 years, the world still thinks that Armenia took back this land arbitrarily.

Take a look at the map of Armenia and Azerbaijan, does it look normal or unusual to you, especially seeing Nachicevan completely landlocked by Armenia though still belonging to Azerbaijan. --MarshallBagramyan 19:27, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I have my facts straight, trust me. There is no point in keeping this discussion going, you have your opinions and I have mine, facts can and are often manupilated.--Moosh88 20:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

First off Marshall your opinion on Karabakh is off topic to this discussion, we are neither talking about Stalin or Nakhchivan. Karabakh was never giving to Azerbaijan by Stalin, because it already was part of Azerbaijan in the ADR. You have your side of the story and we have ours, discuss that in a different article. Im not really interessed in how much percentage is occupied by Armenians (eventhough its official 18%). We are discussing the fact that Azerbaycan is occupied by Armenia and Moosh is denying this fact, Im glad you accept it. I just made a little change to this article about the Russian Air Force base. The Russian aircrafts should be in the Russian base sector. Baku87 18:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

Marshall's opinion is right on, everything he said is true, there is the real version (Armenian), and then there is the fake version yours. I have asked you twice not to continue this pointless argument and yet you continue. Also, your edit for the article was not needed. The dispute has been settled concerning this article, so leave it alone.--Moosh88 19:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Like you said yourself its just an opinion, and opinion are neither true nor false. Since you like to be so anti-Azeri I will use more stronger words for you. The Armenian side is the false on, you are the one who is denying the 20% occupation of Azerbaijan Republic lands by Armenia. Just getting the facts straight. I edited the fact that Armenia does nor reply on the Russian aircrafts, those are in property of the Russian base not Armenia.Baku87 00:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

I guess you don't understand very well. If you continue with your POV pushing, in short time you will be banned. I'm tired of dealing with you, when all you want to do is argue.--Moosh88 01:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I have been scrolling through and quite frankly am shocked by the level of subjective impartiallity being shown. There is talk about a genocide un-proven Internationally. Then talk about the Treaty of Sevres, please, many Brittish servicemen died for that idiotic attempt to partician land into economic parcels. It was a mistake on our behalf, the war was lost, the Turkish Republic drew up the Treaty of Lausanne, which is internationally accepted. It's like my claiming that the Brittish should be able to rule Canada, Australlia etc because they were once a part of the Brittish Empire. Treaty of Sevres is an obsolete treaty, it cannot be used as any sort of evidence as it has no relation to todays world.

There is Azerbaycan land which is Illegally occupied, there is no getting around this fact, lets get to the realities. That Baku guy gave Official Sources, I have read them and they are credible, whereas, everything else has been subjective speculation.

Try to keep it objective and keep Nationalist chauvanism out of the equation. johnstevens5

And you think Azeris aren't nationalistic and bellicose? It isn't Armenia who is constantly taunting another country by renewing a conflict again. Look, I know you are an Azeri so its natural to support your side just like how Moosh and I support the Armenian side of the argument. I appreciate your input but it irks me when you come here and attempt to portray yourself as impartial observer on the article, citing the Armenians for doing x and y.

Baku just cited the CIA website on a number which is often repeated by the Azeri government but wholly inaccurate. I'll give the official statistics on how much land the Armenians are onbut the number is much closer to 13% than it is to 18%.

And welcome, enjoy your stay on Wikipedia.--MarshallBagramyan 03:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Once more you are a Armenians supporting the NKR, if you going to claim thats the occupied areas are 13% and not 20% (or 18%) then please provide us with your international and neutral sources Baku87 16:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

re-Focus

Let's please keep the polemics to user talk pages. If someone wishes to facilitate a discussion on theirs, about the Azeri-Armenian conflict, about convenient villains, about chauvinism and nationalism in general, or about how one day (though perhaps not in our lifetimes), all these needless, irrational conflicts that plague humankind will seem like a bad dream, well, in that event, I would be more than happy to participate (just drop me a note). But this talk page concerns the Military of Armenia. Not the Military of Armenia in the abstract, but as pertaining to this article. The above conversation is, thus, largely a misuse of this talk page. Now, I've made quite a few changes to both the Military of Armenia and Military of Azerbaijan articles, including hidden comments only viewable upon editing. Please review my (and any other) changes, and the article/s in its entirety, and propose or implement directly any changes as you see fit. But please restrict this talk page for these purposes. Thanks. El_C 11:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you El C, please keep monitoring this talk page.--Moosh88 01:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Problems

I would like to find some information about the situation of the recrutes. I know that many young Armenians would like not to serve in the army. Never the less, I got the impression that the situation (the problems with Dedovshchina in particular) is better than in Russia or Azärbaycan. Is this true? --Ulf-S. 11:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Needs to be expanded

I think that this article really needs to be expanded (look at how long the Azerbaijan military article is!). We also need to create articles on the Armenian Air Defense and the Armenian Border Guard. -- Aivazovsky 20:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay that is no reason to keep the expand tag but what ever, who cares about there military, im working on the defense one now. Nareklm 03:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Mig-29s

There is a misteke. The Armenian military has no Mig-29s. The ones stationed in armenia belong to the russian air force. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jaffen (talk • contribs) 10:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

Yeah you got a point there, I dont see any American warplanes in the list of Saudi warplanes either, so Im guessing EDIT? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 145.83.1.6 (talk) 12:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Budget? The real one?

Can we get some proof on that $265 million budget? It says proposal but proposals arent supposed to be pointed as the budget, we need the correct figures not political figures.

Okay, I took out the 2007 one. Defense Minister says the 260 million 2007 budget is a draft [2]. I'll add when it become official on the Armenian Military website. I left the 2006 one for now. - Fedayee 15:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Picture of Su-25

I clearly doubt that the two aircrafts pictured in the last photography of the gallery section are Su-25. They are either Mig-23BN or Mig-27. Just look at the wings' position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.76.154 (talk) 12:08, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Restored images. VartanM (talk) 22:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:ArmenianPatrolKosovo.jpg

The image File:ArmenianPatrolKosovo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• File:Armenian T-72.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The branches of the Armenian army

1. The Armenian border guard is not a branch of the armed forces of Armenia, it belongs to the Armenian National Security. The army defends the border too, but the army soldiers at the border are normal infanterists of the five army corps.

2.The Armed forces of Armenia have not a classsical structure(with land forces, air force etc.) There are many branches(air defence, artillery and rocket forces, the 5 army corps, aviation, nbc-defence, military academies, military police, operative staff and many other branches.) There isn`t a explicit army branch which is seperated from the air force or the air defence.

3. Not all of the mentioned army generals are in active service. And some of the ranks are wrong.

Vahram

---

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.245.165.159 (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou Vahram; can you give us a list of changes which we should make..? We'd be happy to make the article better. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

New Armenian-Russian agreement

This new information must be reflected in the article. The new treaty has left Armenia more dependent on Russia then ever, information can be found at this website: http://www.rferl.org/content/Closer_Military_Ties_With_Armenia_To_Boost_Russias_Regional_Clout/2126126.html 62.217.151.98 (talk) 10:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, this info should be added. Whether Armenia is more or less dependant on Russia is subjective and therefore there is no room for it to be added. It would be the same as saying the azeri military is still a bunch of men with arms, some would say this is not true, others would say it is rather close to reality. Again, the point is to present facts, and not opinions coated as facts.--75.132.44.13 (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

structure of the armenian army

you can find the whole information about the general staff and the organization of the Armenian army on the official website of the ministry of defense: http://www.mil.am/arm/?page=5&id=&p=0&y=2010&m=10&d=04# or http://www.mil.am/eng/?page=5&id=&p=0&y=2010&m=10&d=04

         http://www.mil.am/images/sxema.gif

Vahram —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.253.17.160 (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Armed Forces of Armenia subsection Armenian Army

On the armed forces page under the subsection of the armenian army the information is not updated its not current. on the actual armenian army page it is updated.but not on the armed forces page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenian1987 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

I will check it out. If what you say is true then we should update it.--Moosh88 (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I see that for the armed forces page under subsection armenian army it is not yet updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenian1987 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Cooperation with foreign nations

Here is some info you might want to add for overseas military training of the Armed Forces.

 http://www.mil.am/1298097437  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.136.142 (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 

Armenian T-80's?

Armenia will NEVER get the T-80's unless they pay the full price for it. Why are some uneducated persons adding that Armenia has 20 T-80 tanks without a link where everyone can read clearly? I place only proved unit counts from the IISS 2010 and not because I don't want to read Armenian T-80's. No link means no proof, so you may delete it when you want :-)Sonertje80 (talk) 16:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect information

Armenian AFV's in inventory are as fellows: 102 T-72 tanks, 8 T-54 tanks. Not more, not less. They have a lot of BMP-1's and a few of BMP-2's. This all according to IISS 2010 yearbook. Buy it and you can read the weakness of Armenian army too what it all got deleted when I entered it here! I have also edited the S-75 and S-125 missiles, they are all high altitude, medium range missiles.Sonertje80 (talk) 10:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

---

Official Azerbaijan has a multi democracy goverment, this only shows your POV. Read my explanation below.

the armed forces page of the armenian army doesnt match the correct information on the actual army page. just wanted to correct it and match what it says on the actual armenian army page about the number of tanks and armoured vehicle. (ARMENIAN1986 (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC))

China?

Please show source that China is actively arming Armenia's army. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MosMusy (talk • contribs) 18:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

It has been reported (mediamax I think) that the Armenians have intrest in the BM-30 Smerch MLRS. But it is not clear if they will buy them.Sonertje80 (talk) 10:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Armenian Missiles

 To the person who keeps changing the Armenian Missiles Section. You don't have a clue about what you're talking about! You're not doing anyone a favor with your false info. Leave the section be as it is.

The Armenian Army has BM-21s, WM-80s, Tochka-Us, and SCUB-B (bought in 1996 not 1992). The Smerch has not entered our inventory yet. And there's no prove of it's existance in the Armenian Army. Stop removing the Tochka's and adding Smerch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.62.171.49 (talk) 10:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Armenian army winter camuflage.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Armenian army winter camuflage.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 7 January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Armed Forces of Armenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090210230833/http://www.pims.org:80/news/2008/08/06/rubezh-2008-the-first-large-scale-csto-military-exercise to http://www.pims.org/news/2008/08/06/rubezh-2008-the-first-large-scale-csto-military-exercise
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121130023232/http://www.kansascity.com:80/2012/11/27/3936209/kansas-national-guard-aiding-armenian.html to http://www.kansascity.com/2012/11/27/3936209/kansas-national-guard-aiding-armenian.html#storylink=cpy
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927211223/http://library.aua.am/library/news/archive/2006_11-14.htm to http://library.aua.am/library/news/archive/2006_11-14.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081205073822/http://afp.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5jJANqHYIy4fh_F3IKdxJh0t1APQg to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jJANqHYIy4fh_F3IKdxJh0t1APQg

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120313203235/http://www.pr-inside.com/armenia-to-double-its-peacekeepers-contingent-r604186.htm to http://www.pr-inside.com/armenia-to-double-its-peacekeepers-contingent-r604186.htm

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Armed Forces of Armenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061030025145/http://www.armeniadiaspora.com/gallery/independence15/index.html to http://www.armeniadiaspora.com/gallery/independence15/index.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927184650/http://www.armeniandiaspora.com/archive/41902.html to http://www.armeniandiaspora.com/archive/41902.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armed Forces of Armenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140227124643/https://www.eurasianhome.org:80/ to http://www.eurasianhome.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Armed Forces of Armenia

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Armed Forces of Armenia's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ARMY":

• From Armenian Army: [3] Armyrecognition.com Armenia Land Forces military equipment and vehicles Armenian Army. August 2013.
• From Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina: "Bosnia Herzegovina Land Forces military equipment, armament and vehicles Army". armyrecognition.com. Retrieved 2014-10-15.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armed Forces of Armenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051202115302/http://newsfromrussia.com:80/main/2003/11/12/51161.html to http://newsfromrussia.com/main/2003/11/12/51161.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)