Talk:Ariana Grande/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 14:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

This is the second GA nom, following an auto fail from 8 years ago. The article seems to be more stable now, and I am ready to help make this a GA article. I am going on holiday from 27 July to 3 August so I may not be able to respond swiftly. Cherrell410^{(t · c)} 15:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

Leaving my suggestions for improvement below:

• Early life: final sentance of first paragrahph: this needs to be clarified on when it was last updated.
• 2008–2012: citation needed tag needs to be dealt with
• 2008-2012: much of the last paragraph occurs in the 2013, and should be moved into the section below
• 2013-2015: first sentance of second paragraph needs a citation
• 2013-2015: another citation needed tag
• 2013-2015: the beginning of the final paragraph should talk more about this tour, as it was pretty notable as her first world tour
• 2015-2017: first para: her and meghan trainor: replace the pronoun her with something else
• 2015-2017: to promote the related album --> to promote the album
• 2015-2017: funk wav bounces vol 1 should be italicized
• The following ref numbers aren't reliable and need to be replaced or removed (not in any order): 282, 289, 74 (i'm seeing gossip), 77 (same), 342, 429, 432, 441
• Ref 464 is missing parameters

I dealt with most of the problems alr Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

• Drive-by comment: the article cites a few unreliable sources per WP:RSP, like IBTimes and Inquisitr. Sources like PopSugar are also questionable, especially for a BLP. Pamzeis (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
• Cherrell410 are you gonna finish the review or have you just abandoned it in its entirely? — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 23:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

  Brachy0008 I should advise you to change the page number from 2 to 3, since the reviewer has been inactive since 24 September, as he only made one edit after making one edit since 6 September. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 06:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)