Talk:Ardeshir Tarapore/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I'll start this in a day or two. auntieruth (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for taking up the nomination. I'll be looking forward for your comments. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga

(talk • mail) 16:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

• minor tweaks on verb agreement and clarity here
• this sentence doesn't make sense to me: However, this operation failed as the presence of Pakistani troops was reported locals. auntieruth (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: Thanks for the review. I've amended the sentence to be clear. Kindly take a look. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: Thanks for review. Please update the article class on the talk page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: