Talk:Archie Morris

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archie Morris redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chicago

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles

Television: ER Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the ER task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Is this necessary? edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is the line "Fulfilling the adage of those who don't do, teach" really necessary here? I ask since I am not an avid viewer of ER and am unsure if there's some backstory to the comment. If there isn't, it seems superfluous, and I will remove it. Ericfassbender 16:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's one of the reasons the article supposedly "lacks a formal tone." The whole thing is a bit too glib for the editors' taste, probably. Cranston Lamont 21:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:DEPROD edit

This page was proposed for deletion by Aguyintobooks (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
No sources for over 8 years!
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2017-09-16 with the comment:
Unsourced is not a valid WP:DEL-REASON. WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:NODEADLINES.

Add topic