 | Anushtegin Gharchai has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 30, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
|
Untitled edit
From the Talk:Khwarezmian Empire page:
| “ | According to a legend, the name Anush was for one of the first people in the Earth, who was a son of Shith and grandson of Adam (look: Abu Hanifa ad-Dinawari, p. 3). Khusraw I Anushirwan had been named anushak-ruban, what means in Pahlawi “of Immortal Spirit”. His son with his Chriatian wife had been named Anusha-zadh, i.e. the descendent of Anusha. Look: Browne E.G. A Literary History of Persia, pр. 107, 135, 181, 168. The same name had the ancestor of Khwarizmshahs dynasty Anush-tegin Garcha’i (ruled in 1077 - 1097). Look: Buniyatov Z.M. Gosudarstvo khorezmshahov-Anushteginidov, p. 223. | ” |
Tājik 12:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
@ Baristarim edit
Why do you want to push for the term "Turkic"?! What's important is NOT is Turkic background, but his origins as a slave! At that time, entire Central Asia was gouverned by Turks ... what's the big deal?!
Tājik 11:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Compromise? edit
Dear Tajik, Who compromised with whom. I can not see any consensus about your alleges about origin/history/name.. all. Come here and discuss if you dont agree. This is our history, bring your sources if you insist in your alleges. Regards. MustTC 17:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sources have been presented, and the compromise was with User:Baristarim and User:Ro4444. Tājik 18:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)