Talk:Anti-Monopoly

Trademark Lawsuit

I removed the reference to the Supreme Court in the description fo the trademark infringement lawsuit concerning the word 'monopoly,' because the Supreme Court was never involved. A quick Lexis search for "anti-monopoly" reveals that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found in favor of Anti-Monopoly, Inc. in Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 684 F.2d 1316 (9th Cir. 1982), and the Supreme Court denied cert (that is, they decided not to hear the case and let the lower court's decision stand). See CPG Prods. Corp. v. Anti-Monopoly, Inc., 459 U.S. 1227 (1983) (denying cert). I have substituted an accurate description of the case. Elliotreed 06:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Reference for law passed by congress

I added a reference on that, but now I came to believe it may not be the right reference. I'd really appreciate some double-checking or digging for references. Thanks! Gabiteodoru (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-Monopoly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929135038/http://www.universitygames.com/ugitem.asp?itemno=01851&brand=UG to http://www.universitygames.com/ugitem.asp?itemno=01851&brand=UG

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Anti monopoly bordspel.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

AntiMonopoly.com no longer exists

The reference should be removed or changed to an archive.org link. 伟思礼 (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

True, You are right. Please give an archive link 182.69.182.156 (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Anti monopoly available for purchase

There is a board game called Anti-Monopoly for sale by University Game company (sold on Amazon and at Macys) 24.216.106.15 (talk) 04:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)