Talk:Anonymity (social choice)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with "One man, one vote?" edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As title says. Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 23:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I do not think this really makes sense or at least I do not see any reason for that. Anonymity is a well-defined social choice property, "One man, one vote?" is in some sense just a slogan which could be interpreted in different ways. Hiding anonymity there feels wrong. Jannikp97 (talk) 02:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic