Talk:Animal mummy
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
_01.svg){kind=small}
Pugs, elephants, hermit crabs, and ligers were definitely not mummified by the Egyptians. Therefore, I am editing it. --76.126.102.42 (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Animal mummy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107021735/http://www.animalmummies.com./project.html to http://www.animalmummies.com/project.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problem or copying from Wikipedia? edit
The presence of an end-of-sentence asterisk, which I have just removed, and wording in that section suggested to me that text in this article might have been copied, from a source that used an asterisk as a footnote symbol. However, searching found only this academia.edu article. That's extremely close to this article, and the first version of this article (in 2008) had the misspelling "immorality" for "immortality" that jumped off the page at me; however, the academia.edu article also misspells "Apis" "Abis", and that and other features were not present in this article when the Apis section was first added; and the academia.edu article only shows up in the Wayback Machine in 2017. So it is quite possible it has copied slabs of text from the Wikipedia article without attribution. However, it is also possible there is a common source, so I will leave this here to note the possibility. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)