Talk:Angamaly

Municipal Town or Suburb

Page 13 of [1] has M next to Angamaly which indicates it is a municipality. I dont understand where it states that it is a suburb of Kochi? Jovian Eye _talk 14:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

U mean the given municipalities- Aluva, Paravur, Kalamassery, Tripunithura, Angamaly, Kakkanad, Maradu, Eloor etc.... are only just municipalities and not the suburbs of Kochi?

--Bijuts (talk) 08:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes my point is Angamaly is a municipality by itself and not a suburb of Kochi. Aluva is also a municipality and not a suburb of Kochi! Kakkanad I believe is a suburb of Kochi. But, Angamaly is definitely not suburb of Kochi. I hope this dispute is resolved here as the reference is very clear. If you still need additional ref please see this article. --Jovian Eye _talk 12:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I agree that Angamaly is a municipality. But also its a suburb of Kochi. Dear Jovianeye, please study well before revert. For more information please see [2] [3] these references

--Bijuts (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angamaly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081030085443/http://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S11/KL_Dist_PC_AC.pdf to http://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S11/KL_Dist_PC_AC.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Non Notable Names from Section Personalities

Good Day,
All the names currently listed in Section [Personalities] are uncited and appear to be Non Notable Entities i.e.: not adhering to WP:BLPCAT and WP:LISTPEOPLE.
In view of this, an wp:alumni template has been added to the section to alert users to attach proper citations. I propose to delete the Non Notable names from the list if no citations are provided affirming to the Notability of the Persons named, keeping in line with WP:SOURCELIST
Thank You,
STC1 (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)