Talk:Andy Looney

Fluxx Mensa Mind Games award

In trying to add some references, I note that Fluxx won the Mensa Mind Games award in 1999, but the Mensa site that lists the Past Winners won't allow me to go directly to the page - someone would have to select the year to see it won the award. How best should I cite this? --Timotab 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• Good question!  :) The answer is, something doesn't have to be online to be cited -- it just needs to be a reliable source. See WP:CITE and WP:ATT for more info. In a nutshell though: Cite something in such a way that an independent editor, not familiar with the subject, could verify the information. --Elonka 03:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

References in General

Full Disclosure: I'm a fan of the Looney Labs Product line, so I'm presenting references here for others to look at and review, to avoid any appearance of COI.

Fluxx was also number 34 in the National Games Week top 100 played games of 2006

There was also an article published in Games Magazine In October 2005. I have a copy of the content of the article, and have no reason to believe it's not genuine, but the copy of that content is not from a reliable source. I'm trying to get my hands on the October 2005 edition of the magazine to verify it, but even if I do, how would one cite that?

--Timotab 03:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

also found a review of Aquarius in The Missoulian (a local Montana newspaper) --Timotab 04:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I couldn't get the National Games Week link to work. Is there a better source for that information?

The Games Magazine would be a great source, and you can probably use {{citation}} within a <ref>.

Andy blah blah something blah<ref name="gamesmag">{{Citation | last = | first = | author-link = | last2 = | first2 = | author2-link = | title = | newspaper = | pages = | year = | date = | url = }}</ref>. More stuff, blah blah.

If you need help with that, let me know. More information can be found here and here.

I do remember reading that Montana newspaper article, but I'm not sure what information we could pull from it.

Good luck with the cleanup and referencing! ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 13:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• • The NGW page seems to have gone in the last day or two! I've emailed them to see what's up and am looking for an alternate source for that info. Otherwise, I've added a number of other citations. Does that look a bit better now?--Timotab 22:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Whee! References! Looking great! Thanks for all the sources and such. I'm more of a cleanup person, so I appreciate anyone who does the research. ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 05:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

re: Addition of section about marijuana activism.

Andy has been an outspoken activist of ending marijuana prohibition in the US. His company publishes the game Stoner Fluxx which includes, at least in my version, a manifesto of sorts. Also, see: <http://www.wunderland.com/LooneyLabs/StonerFluxx/activists.html> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.164.1.116 (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andy Looney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080418005900/http://www.originsgamefair.com/aagad to http://www.originsgamefair.com/aagad

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)