Talk:Andrew Pennington

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Vice regent in topic Requested move 17 October 2021

Grammar edit

The article needs attention. There are several places where it is unclear who is being referred to. Also the sentence "he read a letter on which he had been asked to advise" is ambiguous - who had been asked "to advise"? Had the constituent asked "for advice"? If so, that is what the article should say.Royalcourtier (talk) 22:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 October 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Those in favor of the move seem to believe this is a case of WP:ONEEVENT, while others think Andrew Pennington is notable in his own right. I see no consensus here and I doubt relisting will help. AfD might be a better venue to evaluate whether an article on Pennington alone is justified. (non-admin closure) VR talk 01:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


Andrew PenningtonMurder of Andrew Pennington – The article seems to be less about Pennington's biography and more about his murder. Given the content at hand, I think a rename would be an appropriate course of action here. Love of Corey (talk) 01:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.