The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Of course Migration Watch UK has provided research for the Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration; they are sister organisations. The Group's website "was created, and is updated and financed by Migrationwatch UK at the request of the Cross Party Group for Balanced Migration." (Source: the Group's website) One is the mouthpiece of the other.
It should be noted that All Party Parliamentary Groups or Associate Parliamentary Groups are informal cross-party groups that have no official status within Parliament. Source www.parliament.co.uk
They should not be confused with Parliamentary Select Committees, which check and report on areas ranging from the work of government departments to economic affairs. The results of these inquiries are public and many require a response from the government. Source www.parliament.co.uk
It is hardly noteworthy that Migration Watch provided material to the Parliamentary Group; one would not really expect it to do otherwise. My concern is that the phrasing of this paragraph creates a perception of authority that is not merited - that the Cross Party Group has some official standing, on a par with a Select Committee. The mention of its (distinguished) co-chairmen seems no more than name-dropping intended to imply a validity and gravity that are not necessarily a consequence. The statement does not reflect the history of criticism of Migration Watch's research, or state what significance the Group has attached to it. In short, there is no point to this paragraph, and, bearing in mind Moonshineblue's editing history, which relates solely to Andrew Green and Migrationwatch, there must be grave doubts as to the neutrality of this entry. It is not, btw, a "responsibility" - again, this smacks of puffery rather than NPOV. Chris Custodiet (talk) 23:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
