 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (interested in his philanthropy). --132.3.33.81 (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The article does not link to Andrew, it links to a family member. David C 00:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadeslair (talk • contribs)
Redirect edit
This article should be redirected to Gordon Getty as the individual isn't notable on his own. Andrew's coverage is limited to his obituaries/investigation, leaving little to no coverage of his earlier life or anything other than his death. – czar 22:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- I disagree. He is/was notable.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- "It's notable" is an argument to avoid. I gave you my rationale for how it is against policy (see "people notable for only one event" for more). What's your response? – czar 23:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Circumstances of death edit
Why was he found by his ex-girlfriend, when there was supposed to be a restraining order against her? Is there any more information available about the death.122.59.83.216 (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Anal sex? edit
[1]. [2] --87.155.247.223 (talk) 08:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)