Talk:Andrea Cagan

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Are collaborations not books? ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's an odd distinction written by the article's originator, presumably the subject.[1] ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Mmmm... In any case, I hope that the new section names I have used work for you. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reliable source? edit

As part of ongoing mediation, I've opened a thread to discuss the status of Cagan's Peace is Possible as a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. See User talk:Steve Crossin/Mediation/Prem Rawat#Issue/Discussion topic D: Cagan. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrea Cagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply