Talk:Ancient pyramid
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Gene Poole in topic Yonaguni & Visočica Hill
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Untitled edit
Reguarding the unproven pyramid in Bosnia: Do we include every hill that someone thinks might be a pyramid? -- Ronz 15:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- No, I don't think we do. Do you have any more examples, out of interest?. As there has been international media attention on the Bosnian hill, and we have a Wikipedia article on it, I think it's fair to mention it in this article, but perhaps not in the main list - maybe a good compromise would be to put it in a See Also section? SP-KP 15:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- In my opinion the Bosnian pyramid should be included on this list. Whether it is really a pyramid or not is beside the point - enough people claim that it is to make it's inclusion valid. --Gene_poole 01:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Yonaguni & Visočica Hill edit
Scientific concensus to date is these are both natural formations. --Ronz 15:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- That may be so, but the primary reason knowledge of them has wide currency is because of the pyramid speculations surrounding them. We are here to document, not pronounce judgement on unscientific theories. --Gene_poole 21:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- It was the only alternative I could think of, creating the "dubious" section, short of removing them completely. Can you think of a more neutral title? --Ronz 01:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree wholeheartedly with the inclusion of the "dubious" category. My comments where posted before I realised that's what you'd done; I thought you were proposing that they should be deleted. --Gene_poole 01:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- It was the only alternative I could think of, creating the "dubious" section, short of removing them completely. Can you think of a more neutral title? --Ronz 01:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)