Talk:Ancient accounts of Homer
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point
edit| Cleanup Co-ordination | |
|---|---|
|
This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page. |
Discussion
editThe article was created from 1911 EB write-up, which serves as the starting point for so many articles. In the case of this particular topic a lot of discoveries have been made since then. The topics also are not very clear. For example, what documentation? It can't mean biographies as there are plenty of those. What, does it mean inscriptions? What is the assertion looking for, a birth certificate? The underlying problem is variability in the assertions of the extensive sources. I see this as a total rewrite. Nothing is being said here. We need to say something. Too sparse, too general, too devoid of content, too full of vague and undefined terms.Botteville (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)