Talk:Ancient Bath House of Nazareth
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ancient Bath House of Nazareth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notability
editWith the amount of press coverage, I think the Bath House passes the notability guideline, and there is a lot more information that can be added, to make it in size and scope to deserve its own article.
I know this initial page mostly copies the information from the Mary's Well article, but I will be adding more this coming week, and encourage other editors to add more also, and give their feedback. --Pordaria (talk) 11:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Military camp, not village, bathhouse
editThe design and construction of the bath house in Nazareth is of early first century Roman style indicating that a Roman military camp instead of a Jewish village was located there in the early first century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yumalaton (talk • contribs) 02:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ancient Bath House of Nazareth. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://users.drew.edu/csavage/Nazareth.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
See discussion at "Mary's Well"
editPlease see discussion started at Talk:Mary's Well#Ancient bathhouse. It deals wit notability, connection to Marian tradition, but mainly with the sub-standard quality of the material. Until it reaches a minimal level, this material shouldn't be on Wiki, and certainly not on that possibly unrelated page (just same source of water, IF even that).
What is the topic here?
- Ancient water installations? How old? Using what water source? Serving what? (Maybe a military camp, or travellers on a main road. Most certainly not a 1st-c. tiny rural hamlet half a mile away.)
- A bath house? From what period? Attached to what? Military camp, caravanseray,... what?
- Every new discovery from the Holy Land, and even more so from a pilgrimage place like Nazareth, receives oversized press coverage. This isn't proof of long-term notability.