This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am not even sure why this warrants an explanation. It should be common sense. But I undid an edit that changed this article to put Anastasia's birth at c.1400 from flourished, despite the lack of any research to support it. I would have left it there even though the editor was simply guessing, but it is highly, highly improbable that Anastasia could have been born anywhere close to 1400 since there was a known date applied to her life (which actually is all that is known about her) that was published in 1405. That would have made her 5 years old when she was an accomplished and famous manuscript illuminator. I would say that is more likely, almost impossible. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
