Talk:American Alpine Club

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with The Access Fund edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Merge to parent organization -- no separate notability. DGG ( talk ) 14:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure I agree. While affiliated they seem to operate autonomously, work on different projects, and pursue slightly different advocacy. Ryanx7 (talk) 22:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I definitely don't think they should be merged. I support/belong to both organizations. They have separate membership, have their headquarters in different towns, have separate leadership, and different goals. The Access Fund was once a part of the AAC but they are now separate. You wouldn't put England and the USA in the same article just because the one was once a part of the other. -- Luke S. Sept 15 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeclimber (talk • contribs) 02:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Separate for sure. Perhaps a link to each other in respective pages, given their shared history, but the two are totally separate. Daxueshan (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pages should remain separate. These are two distinct entities. I am a member of both, and a volunteer chair for the AAC. TheJohnRichardson (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Alpine Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130108025239/http://www.americanalpineclub.org/grants/g/7/Lyman-Spitzer-Cutting-Edge-Climbing-Award to http://www.americanalpineclub.org/grants/g/7/Lyman-Spitzer-Cutting-Edge-Climbing-Award

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic