Talk:Ambivalent prejudice

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Rice University/Human Development in Global and Local Communities, Section 1 (Spring 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Comprehensive Article Expansion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As part of a class project, I will be editing this article. I plan to expand it to include information on the empirical studies on ambivalent prejudice including the measures used and examples, mechanisms and underlying causes, consequences, mitigation, and criticisms. If anyone has any recommendations or helpful information on how to proceed with the article, I would love to hear them. Brodgers15 (talk) 23:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think that this contribution does not only enhance what was already included in the original article, but really helped make this article more comprehensive as a whole. Your writing style was very easy to follow and your sourcing helped add to the credibility of the article. My only suggestion would be that if you have time, maybe go back and add more sections on even more minority groups that may be vulnerable to ambivalent prejudice (such as Hispanic and Asian Americans or the LGBT community). Dmillar23 (talk) 01:49, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Redundancy edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"This is due to male ambivalence having three sources: paternalism, gender differentiation, and heterosexuality.[2][9] This assessment measures an individual's endorsement of ambivalent sexism. The theory of ambivalent sexism postulates that male ambivalence has three sources: paternalism, gender differentiation, and heterosexuality."

Because this phrase is used as the end of one thought and the beginning of another thought, I'm not sure which one should be deleted. It's awkward to read as is. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmonex (talk • contribs) 06:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic