Talk:Altitude (film)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ. |
Copyright problem removed edit
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Uhm, lol? edit
"Five teenage friends rent a plane to go to a Coldplay concert (that right there is enough to root for bad things to happen)."
Just...yeah. lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haylium (talk • contribs) 16:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
"Lovecraftian horror"? edit
The article says this is a Lovecraftian horror movie... this seems like a bit of a stretch.
Is there any indication that the filmmakers were influenced by Lovecraft? Some press articles seem to make the assumption, but "Lovecraftian" means more than just "the monster's got tentacles". In fact the Lovecraftian horror article on wikipedia gives a pretty good run down of all the major themes in Lovecraft's work, and none of them is an especially good fit for this movie. This movie has some themes and plot elements that actually seem to be contrary to ideas in Lovecraftian horror. The MOST that can be said is that the creature design might be influenced by Lovecraftian creatures... but even then it's not especially close. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.177.167 (talk) 22:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Needs a rewrite edit
The plot section is waaaaay too long and detailed and there has to be a general cleanup throughout as most/if not all the reference sources are from blogs and other unreliable sourcing. Comments? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC).
Reviews And Other Suggestions edit
I was wondering if someone could take a look at the edits created on the Reception section and discuss whether these sources are reliable and there is no original content. I think that I have given a balanced approach but still, need some advice on whether I could add more reviews or sources. I also believe that a greater elaboration on the "Release" section needs to be examined.