Talk:Alrosa

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Colonel Gorshkov in topic Neutrality

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo alrosa.gif edit

 

Image:Logo alrosa.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Name edit

Per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(trademarks)#General_rules, I'm changing the name to standard English usage (Alrosa), except for one mention of their preference. Superm401 - Talk 05:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The NAME !
The head of ALROSA asked to halve his salary due to sanctions
Does he need these rubles at all?
(Characteristics of the Alrosa ALRS stock / Change per year
-47.013%)Colonel Kuznets (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality edit

This page has been nominated to be checked for neutrality, but all I can see there are facts. I think that the template can now be removed.Jimjamjak (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

completely neutral :
mining of diamonds
2017 - 39,6 mln. carat
2018 - 36,7 mln. carat
2019 - 38,5 mln. carat
2020 - 30, à mln. carat
Included . Alrosa NV , Antwerp :
2020
Sales: + 644 %
Profit / Loss: - 60 % (https://www.companyweb.be/nl/0463468572/alrosa-belgium)2A02:A018:3E:C00:D5F5:60EA:9836:4308 (talk) 13:05, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, we are sufficiently neutral.
Probably.
"Alrosa" is being prepared for bankruptcy status.
For ... ?
For a reorganization into a CLOSED / State owned corporation.
the profit . Are for so-called pöpel (small aktioner's), - sometimes too BIG !
So-called TOP menedges are often just espios. Have and has nothing to do with the diamond trade.
(Future TOP politicians of Russia  ! )Padaroki (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

After the introduction of the embargo.

On "Alrosa" diamonds. Strengthening moderation. Wikipedia.org pages dedicated to the "Alrosa" company.

Neutrality - , for some of the Web Admins.

The complete absence of discussion topics. And, a minimum of information. About the largest in the World! Firma  and ... PRODUCENT  of diamonds ..And, after all, it's interesting. Do you know that? :)...Colonel Gorshkov (talk) 16:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ALROSA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alrosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply