Talk:Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gerda Arendt in topic 1523 works

1523 works edit

This is categorised as "1523 works" yet the year 1523 isn't mentioned at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

1522/23 is mentioned. We'll never know for sure, but this was translated. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
So it's probably better off being a Category:1520s works, right? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Then it would be 1520s in English, but 1523 in German. The Gotteslob says simply 1523. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Gerda, I'm just asking the cats to reflect the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's not that easy. The main source, the book in which it appears, has one year, - just the scientists are more careful. "1520s" doesn't reflect "1523 the latest", which is important compared to Luther's 1524. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well the cat and the article should say the same thing. If there's any doubt, it should be 1520s. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The German article just says 1523. I am close to adopting that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Whatever the RS say. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
One source says 1522/23, several say simply 1523. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
So to be safe, it's 1520s. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
I worded differently. 1522/23 may mean "we don't know" or "begun in 1522, completed in 1523". The books I can see where it's printed today say simply 1523, so do I now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply