Talk:All I See

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Release history table edit

The table for the release history section is broken.

Can someone please fix it?

Posted by User:PK2. (6:50 AM)

Fair use of sound file edit

Since the sound file, File:Kylie - all i see.ogg, has been removed by one editor citing WP:NFC, without saying how this image specifically violates it, I am starting a discussion here so that the image is not deleted simply for being orphaned.

The current consensus for sound files are that they are acceptable for use in single/song articles as long as they are small samples of the song. Aspects (talk) 18:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Keep - its useful and helps the readers to get an impression about the song.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 00:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:All I See/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Stub class at moment, hints for improvements:

Start class:

  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the single/song
  •  Y A track listing
  •  N Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single/song; a band navbox is insufficient) (e.g. as far as I can tell we only know that Kylie sings on this single: are there no other performers?)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  •  N All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  Y At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
  •  N Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims (e.g. Brazilian chart position)

B class:

  •  N All the C class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians (e.g. in a separate section)
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Could be C class with a good "personnel" section and a reference for Brazil chart claim.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 21:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on All I See. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on All I See. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply