Talk:All About Steve
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 109.79.85.118 in topic Supplied balancing opinion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Headlines edit
Headlines. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 04:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Supplied balancing opinion edit
The universally negative reception by the critics needed to be balanced by a positive comment, so I added to the external links a link to a positive Guardian item. If anyone wants to move the link to the Reception section, please feel free. David F (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- WP:EL, I removed the link. For starters this underdeveloped article does not yet include any reviews to balance out, so far it only provides an overview from aggregators such as Rotten Tomatoes, and no responses from individual critics or any deeper analysis. Even then the Guardian article you added in defense of Sandra Bullock you didn't make any effort to paraphrase it yourself, and it is an opinion piece not a film review. If the article include several reviews from notable critics, and made some effort to take a deeper look at the film, considering story, acting, direction, cinematography, score, then maybe you could explain that even though the overall response was negative if there were any parts the critics did like. -- 109.79.85.118 (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)