Talk:Alice (South Korean TV series)

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fiction_about_time_travel

This Category should be addeded

--2A02:810D:8B40:2108:BC76:A3FF:720:B1FA (talk) 01:11, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Adding to synopsis edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I propose adding this to the synopsis.

The plot includes multiple versions of a person meeting, either through time travel or dimension hopping; a person apparently being in 2 places at the same time; people traveling back in time to save or kill a loved one or themselves; and Jin-Gyeom and Min-Hyuk fighting. Tae-Yi had an important role in inventing time travel. Jin-Gyeom is indeed the child from the prophecy, and at the end everything is reset to a time line with no time travel.

That way the synopsis would cover the whole series.

There was a complaint about not citing a source? I'm not sure how to interpret that. The source is the series. Isn't that the source for the 2 current paragraphs? 83.94.59.35 (talk) 09:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The current two paragraphs merely summarize the plot; your proposed addition is an analysis and interpretation of the plot, which as explained in the manual of style page you were already linked to in the edit summary, requires a secondary source. Your interpretation of the plot does not appear within the series. Martin IIIa (talk) 23:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic