Talk:Alhazen's problem

Latest comment: 5 years ago by HB in topic Wrong Alhazen's solution

"Islamic mathematics" edit

I don't think there is such a thing as "Islamic Mathematics"; mathematics is a science that's it. I never heard the term "Christian Mathematics” for instance. So, why this page should use the term "Islamic"? People could say is an Arab mathematician, or German etc, whatever is the case. But what religion has to do with this.217.55.172.180 (talk) 18:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have rephrased it, while keeping the link to Mathematics in medieval Islam. I think that the idea is that although there is only one universal field of mathematics, it was developed at different times in different parts of the world, and so it is convenient to break up the history of mathematics and mathematicians into different articles for different cultures. Richard75 (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Diagram edit

This would be much easier to understand if there was a diagram. Richard75 (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Alhazen's problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alhazen's problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Alhazen's solution edit

Sorry but I don't speak fluent english'

I think there is a misunderstanding with reference:

Victor J. Katz (1995), "Ideas of Calculus in Islam and India", Mathematics Magazine.

Katz presents the Alhazen's method to compute volumes, first attempt after Archimedes and before Cavalieri in calculus. There is nothing to do with Alhazen's problem. See A.I. Sabra, Ibn al-Haytham' lemas for solving Alhazen's Problem for the Alhazen's problem proof. HB (talk) 14:24, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply