Talk:Alford plea
Latest comment: 1 year ago by InspectorMendel in topic Article is wordy to the point of being unreadable
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alford plea article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 1 year  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Alford plea. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Alford plea at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | A fact from Alford plea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Article is wordy to the point of being unreadable edit
Most of the article consists of defining the concept over and over in different words. Many different people are quoted giving their own definition; all the definitions having the same meaning.
I tried to find any other information in the article, but every section seems to be infected with this definition-mania.
I don't know anything on the topic so I don't know which definitions to keep and which to remove. But I do know that this article is badly in need of an overhaul. InspectorMendel (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)