This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Contemporary ArtWikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary ArtTemplate:WikiProject Contemporary ArtContemporary Art articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it already has two detailed references in national/international media. --Yaxu (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Furthermore, this is clearly of importance, Alexandra is a major performer and initiator of the highly notable Algorave movement. Yaxu (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion
I've added a link to an interview for Tracks on Arte TV, which was broadcast internationally in two different languages (in Germany and France). I think along with the other references this establishes that she has "become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style", so will remove the tag for now. Yaxu (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
from what I can see the article fails WP:NMG, that's why it was listed. Sent to XfD. Semitransgenictalk. 15:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
No it doesn't, have you actually read WP:NMG? I was referring to it above. That's a real shame you couldn't just discuss it here. Yaxu (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
better to break out discussion at XfD, if consensus supports that it's notable, then no problem, it stays. Semitransgenictalk. 17:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nominating for deletion without reading the sources properly, or spending a moment discussing them here to make sure you understand them, is a waste of time. Yaxu (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
sure, you are entitled to your opinion, but as someone with a clear professional investment in this topic, your view is perhaps a little coloured here, that's why it's best to get broader input. I really don't see the issue with this. Semitransgenictalk. 23:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Please consider WP:BEFORE in the future rather than leaping to nominate for deletion. Yaxu (talk) 09:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
maybe also consider WP:COI next time you use wikipedia for SEO purposes. Semitransgenictalk. 15:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Both of you need to read, absorb and apply WP:Dead horse. Give it a rest. We have an encyclopædia to build, and we need to do it together. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough! Yaxu (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
