Talk:Alexander Rud Mills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Alexander Rud Mills is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 December 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Links edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I have re-added a link to the Alexander Rud Mills project and despite being hosted by Geocities it is the best external source available and also it cites its sources. WP:EL lists types of site which should normally be avoided but I think in this case the content of the page linked to justifies inclusion.--Hengest 20:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You could always ask for permission to mirror it on a non-Geocities page... I think the main contention are the pop-ups and adverts on Geocities - that and it's pretty much a byword for amateur. I concur, that the content is a valuable resource. - WeniWidiWiki 20:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am the copyright holder for the 'individual geocities site' that hosts the Alexander Rudd Mills Project. I am prepared to add detail to the wikipedia page if allowed access. Wodensson 03:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wodensson, you already have access so you can edit whenever you are ready. If you need any help with formatting or citing sources etc. then please ask and somebody here will be happy to help.--Hengest 19:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexander Rud Mills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824023739/http://rspas.anu.edu.au/pah/NSinAustralasia/abstracts.php to http://rspas.anu.edu.au/pah/NSinAustralasia/abstracts.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic