This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Scott Utley edit
I removed mention of Scott Utley because it's not in either of the sources. Looking back at the history, it seems Mr. Utley added mention himself and said in the edit summary that he was Johns' partner. This is the kind of grey area I dislike about Wikipedia sourcing policies. So, should it by mentioned, or left out? Gran2 17:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)